25:00
Focus
Round 1 of 4
Intervals
Focus
25 is just the default from Cirillo's kitchen timer, not a finding.
No study establishes an optimal length. Pick what fits your work.
Short break
Break research favours longer breaks. 5 may be too short.
Long break
After every 4 rounds.
Grow breaks as the session goes
Adds a minute to each break as fatigue accumulates. One study found
rigid 25/5 built fatigue faster than flexible pacing.
Auto-start the next interval
Off means you decide each time. Nothing starts behind your back.
Sound
End-of-interval chime
Two soft notes with a long tail — a timer is a low-urgency alert,
so it is built for low annoyance rather than urgency.
Binaural tones
Two slightly detuned sine waves, one per ear.
Headphones required — on speakers the tones mix in the air and
the effect disappears.
Brown noise
A soft masking layer for a loud room or roommate.
Volume
Loading…
Why this timer is built the way it is
The sentence above the clock is the real feature
Naming a specific first action before you start ("when I start, I will…")
is the best-supported thing in this whole app — Gollwitzer & Sheeran's meta-analysis of
94 studies put it at d = 0.65 on goal attainment. Vague labels like "homework" do not
carry that effect.
Breaks are here to make you feel better, not to make you faster
A 22-study meta-analysis (Albulescu 2022, PLOS ONE) found micro-breaks
reliably raise vigor and cut fatigue — but the effect on actual performance was
not statistically significant. We are not going to tell you otherwise.
Nothing here shames you
No streaks, no leaderboard, no broken-chain graphic. There is no evidence
base for it, and the people most drawn to focus tools are the most likely to be hurt by it.
Your round count resets every day and nobody is watching.
You can always keep going
If the bell rings while you are actually rolling, take the +5.
The popular claim that stopping mid-task helps you resume comes from the Zeigarnik effect,
which does not reliably replicate.